RTTUZYUW RUOIAZZ0614 2402058-UUUU--RHMCSUU.
ZNR UUUUU
R 272058Z AUG 20 MID510001682652U
FM COMNAVSAFECEN NORFOLK VA
TO ALSAFE
BT
UNCLAS
ALSAFE 017/20
SECINFO/U/-//
MSGID/GENADMIN/COMNAVSAFECEN/00/AUG//
SUBJ/RISK MANAGEMENT SAFETY REPORTING GUIDANCE//
REF/A/MSGID:DOC/RMI ENDORSEMENT PROCESS/-//
REF/B/MSGID:DOC/DOD HFACS VERSION 7.0/01OCT2015//
NARR/REF A IS A 10 AUG2020 DOCUMENT DESCRIBING THE NEW PROCESS FOR
ENDORSING SAFETY REPORTS UPON THE INITIAL RELEASE OF THE RMI PROGRAM
OF RECORD. THIS DOCUMENT WAS DISSEMINATED VIA DON TRACKER. REF B IS
DOD HUMAN FACTORS AND ANALYSIS AND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (DOD HFACS).
//
POC/LEWIS, ALAN R/NAVSAFECEN/UNIT:NORFOLK/NAME:757-444-3520 X7037
/TEL:DSN 564-3520 X7037/EMAIL:ALAN.R.LEWIS@NAVY.MIL//
GENTEXT/REMARKS/1.  THIS ALSAFE EXPLAINS THE PROCESS, ROLES,
RESPONSIBILITIES, AND TIMELINES TO REVIEW, ENDORSE, FINALIZE, AND
CLOSE OUT SAFETY INVESTIGATION REPORTS (SIREPS/SIRS) AND HAZARD
REPORTS (HAZREPS) USING THE RISK MANAGEMENT INFORMATION (RMI)
PROGRAM OF RECORD. THIS PROCESS BEGINS WHEN THE INVESTIGATION IS
COMPLETE AND THE SIREP/SIR/HAZREP IS RELEASED BY THE SAFETY
INVESTIGATION BOARD (SIB) OR SINGLE INVESTIGATING OFFICER AND
CONTINUES UNTIL THE RELEASE OF THE FINAL ENDORSEMENT TO THE
SIREP/SIR/HAZREP. ADDITIONALLY, THIS ALSAFE DEFINES
SOME NEW TERMS USED IN SAFETY REPORTING IN RMI AND PROVIDES
CUSTOMERS WITH POINTS OF CONTACT SHOULD THEY HAVE POLICY QUESTIONS
ABOUT SAFETY REPORTING USING RMI. THE ENDORSEMENT PROCESS DESCRIBED
IN THIS CHAPTER MUST BE USED FOR ALL SIREPS/SIRS AND HAZREPS THAT
REQUIRE ENDORSEMENT, WHETHER THE INVESTIGATION WAS CONDUCTED BY AN
SIB OR BY A SINGLE INVESTIGATING OFFICER. THE TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
PROVIDED IN THE ALSAFE APPLY TO ALL RMI USERS.

2. APPLICABILITY. THIS ALSAFE IS APPLICABLE TO ALL U.S. NAVY
COMMANDS AND ACTIVITIES WHO USE THE WEB-ENABLED SAFETY SYSTEM (WESS)
AS THEIR PRIMARY SAFETY REPORTING SYSTEM. THIS ALSAFE IS APPLICABLE
TO ALL U.S. MARINE CORPS COMMANDS AND ACTIVITIES. EFFECTIVE 31 AUG
20, THESE USERS WILL BEGIN USING THE RISK MANAGEMENT INFORMATION
(RMI) PROGRAM OF RECORD FOR ALL SAFETY REPORTING.

3. GENERAL INFORMATION
A. THE ENDORSEMENT PROCESS DESCRIBED IN THIS ALSAFE REPRESENTS A
MAJOR BREAK FROM PAST METHODS. THE PREVIOUS ENDORSEMENT PROCESS
RELIED ON A SPECIFICALLY DEFINED ENDORSING CHAIN THAT TYPICALLY
MIRRORED THE OPERATIONAL CHAIN OF COMMAND TO CONDUCT A FORMAL AND
SEQUENTIAL REVIEW AND ENDORSEMENT OF THE SIREP/SIR, PARTICULARLY
WHEN THE INVESTIGATION WAS CONDUCTED BY AN SIB. EACH COMMAND IN THE
ENDORSING CHAIN REVIEWED BOTH THE SIREP/SIR, AS WRITTEN BY THE SIB
OR SINGLE INVESTIGATING OFFICER, AND THE PREVIOUS ENDORSER(S)
COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, THEN ADDED THEIR OWN ENDORSEMENT. THIS
PREVIOUS PROCESS WAS EXTREMELY LENGTHY, OFTEN REQUIRING MORE THAN A
YEAR FROM MISHAP OCCURRENCE TO FINAL ENDORSEMENT AND CLOSEOUT.

B. THE NEW METHODOLOGY DESCRIBED IN THIS ALSAFE ADOPTS MOST OF THE
U.S. AIR FORCE'S MEMORANDUM OF FINAL EVALUATION (MOFE) PROCESS WHEN
SIREPS/SIRS AND HAZREPS REQUIRE ENDORSEMENT. THE MOFE PROCESS RELIES
ON A CONCURRENT 45 CALENDAR DAY REVIEW AND ENDORSEMENT PERIOD
(CONCURRENT COMMENT PERIOD) FOR ALL ENDORSERS AND INTERESTED
PARTIES, EXCEPT FOR THE FINAL ENDORSER. WHILE THERE REMAINS A
REQUIREMENT FOR THOSE IDENTIFIED AS REQUIRED ENDORSERS TO CRITICALLY
REVIEW THE SIREP/SIR OR HAZREP DURING THE CONCURRENT COMMENT PERIOD,
EXCEPT FOR THE CONVENING AUTHORITY, THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT FOR
ENDORSERS TO ADD COMMENTS IF THEY CONCUR WITH THE SIREP/SIR OR
HAZREP AS WRITTEN BY THE SIB OR SINGLE INVESTIGATING OFFICER. THE
ABSENCE OF A COMMENT IS CONSIDERED TACIT APPROVAL OF THE SIREP/SIR
OR HAZREP.

C. ONCE THE CONCURRENT COMMENT PERIOD ENDS, A SECOND 45 CALENDAR DAY
REVIEW AND ENDORSEMENT PERIOD (DELIBERATION AND ADJUDICATION PERIOD)
BEGINS FOR THE FINAL ENDORSER. DURING THIS PERIOD, THE FINAL
ENDORSER WILL REVIEW AND ADJUDICATE ALL COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
THAT HAVE BEEN MADE BY THE ENDORSERS, THEN COMPLETE AND RELEASE THE
FINAL ENDORSEMENT. WITH THE RELEASE OF THE FINAL ENDORSEMENT, THE
INVESTIGATION IS OFFICIALLY CONSIDERED CLOSED. THE NEW ENDORSEMENT
PROCESS WILL DRAMATICALLY SHORTEN THE TIMELINE FROM THE RELEASE OF
SIREP/SIR/HAZREP TO THE FINAL ENDORSEMENT AND CLOSEOUT.

D. THE ENDORSEMENT PROCESS DOES NOT MINIMIZE THE IMPORTANCE OF
ENDORSERS AND THEIR REVIEW IS A CRITICAL FINAL STEP TO FINALIZE THE
SIREP/SIR/HAZREP. FOR MISHAP INVESTIGATIONS, ENDORSERS MUST STILL
CAREFULLY REVIEW AND EVALUATE THE SIREP/SIR AND ENSURE THAT THE SIB
OR SINGLE INVESTIGATING OFFICER COMPLETED A SUFFICIENTLY RIGOROUS
INVESTIGATION THAT UNCOVERED ALL OF THE CAUSAL FACTORS OF THE
MISHAP. THE SAME APPLIES FOR HAZARD INVESTIGATIONS REQUIRING
ENDORSEMENT, EXCEPT THE ENDORSERS FOCUS ON THE SUFFICIENCY OF THE
INVESTIGATION TO DESCRIBE THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE HAZARD AND ITS
UNDERLYING CAUSES. ENDORSERS MUST ALSO VERIFY THAT THE CONTROLS
RECOMMENDED BY THE SIB OR SINGLE INVESTIGATING OFFICER ARE
SUFFICIENTLY STRONG ENOUGH TO MITIGATE THE IDENTIFIED RISKS,
ENDURING BEYOND THE MISHAP COMMAND, AND ARE SUFFICIENTLY PRACTICAL
AND FEASIBLE TO IMPLEMENT. NOTE: THE TERMS "REVIEW AND ENDORSEMENT
PROCESS," "ENDORSEMENT PROCESS," AND "MOFE PROCESS" MAY BE USED
INTERCHANGEABLY TO DESCRIBE THE PROCESS EXPLAINED IN THIS ALSAFE.
THE ACRONYM "MOFE" AND THE TERM "FINAL ENDORSEMENT" MAY ALSO BE USED
INTERCHANGEABLY TO DESCRIBE THE PRODUCT RELEASED BY THE FINAL
ENDORSER THAT FINALIZES THE SIREP/HAZREP AND OFFICIALLY CLOSES THE
INVESTIGATION. CURRENTLY, CNO N09F (NAVY AS WELL AS MARINE CORPS
AVIATION) AND CMC SAFETY DIVISION (MARINE CORPS GROUND) ARE THE
FINAL ENDORSERS ON ALL REPORTS THAT ENTER THE MOFE PROCESS.

4. DETERMINATION OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR ENDORSEMENT. ALL SIREPS/SIRS
AND HAZREPS THAT CONTAIN RECOMMENDATIONS/CORRECTIVE ACTIONS MUST BE
ENDORSED.

5. SIREP ENDORSEMENT PROCESS STEPS AND TIMELINE. THIS SECTION
DESCRIBES EACH STEP IN THE ENDORSEMENT (MOFE) PROCESS.
A. STEP ONE. REPORT SUBMISSION. THE SIB OR SINGLE INVESTIGATING
OFFICER COMPLETES THE INVESTIGATION AND SUBMITS THE SIREP/SIR OR
HAZREP INTO THE RISK MANAGEMENT INFORMATION (RMI) PROGRAM OF RECORD.
B. STEP TWO. CONVENING AUTHORITY REVIEW. THE CONVENING AUTHORITY
SAFETY OFFICER/SAFETY STAFF CONDUCTS AN ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW OF THE
ENTIRE SIREP/SIR/HAZREP SUBMITTED BY THE SIB/SINGLE INVESTIGATIVE
OFFICER. THIS REVIEW MUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN 10 BUSINESS DAYS. THIS
REVIEW WILL:
(1) ENSURE THE INVESTIGATIVE GUIDANCE AND DOCUMENTATION STANDARDS
ESTABLISHED IN NAVAL SAFETY REPORTING POLICY HAVE BEEN MET.
(2) ENSURE ADEQUATE EVIDENCE AND ANALYSIS IS PRESENTED AND
SUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT THE INVESTIGATION'S FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND
ACCEPTED CAUSAL FACTORS.
(3) ENSURE DOD HUMAN FACTORS ANALYSIS AND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
(HFACS) CODES ARE ASSIGNED AND SUFFICIENT.
(4) ENSURE RECOMMENDATIONS AND ACTION AGENTS ARE ASSIGNED FOR EACH
ACCEPTED CAUSAL FACTOR.
(5) DETERMINE IF THE SIREP/SIR/HAZREP REQUIRES ENDORSEMENT (REQUIRES
ENTRY INTO THE MOFE PROCESS).
(6) WHEN ENDORSEMENT IS REQUIRED, IDENTIFY THE SPECIFIC
COMMANDS/ACTIVITIES THAT ARE REQUIRED ENDORSERS AND ENTER THE
ENDORSER INFORMATION IN RMI. NOTE: DURING STEP TWO, THE CONVENING
AUTHORITY IDENTIFIES THE SPECIFIC COMMANDS/ACTIVITIES THAT ARE
REQUIRED ENDORSERS AND INFORMALLY LISTS THE COMMANDS/ACTIVITIES IN
THE RMI "COMMENTS BOX." ONCE THE NAVAL SAFETY CENTER QUALITY CONTROL
REVIEW (STEP THREE) HAS BEEN COMPLETED, THE CONVENING AUTHORITY MUST
FORMALLY ENTER ENDORSER INFORMATION AT THE BEGINNING OF THE MOFE
PROCESS (STEP FOUR).
C. STEP THREE. NAVAL SAFETY CENTER QUALITY CONTROL REVIEW. NAVAL
SAFETY CENTER CONDUCTS A QUALITY CONTROL REVIEW OF THE
SIREP/SIR/HAZREP. OMISSIONS OR DEFICIENCIES IDENTIFIED DURING THIS
REVIEW ARE ADDRESSED WITH THE SIB/SINGLE INVESTIGATING OFFICER
THROUGH THE CONVENING AUTHORITY SAFETY OFFICER/SAFETY STAFF. THIS
REVIEW MUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN 14 BUSINESS DAYS. ONCE THIS REVIEW
IS COMPLETE, THE SIREP/SIR/HAZREP ENTERS THE CONCURRENT COMMENT
PERIOD. THE UNENDORSED SIREP/SIR/HAZREP IS ALSO AVAILABLE FOR
VIEWING IN THE RMI DATABASE.
D. STEP FOUR. CONCURRENT COMMENT PERIOD. THE 45 CALENDAR DAY
CONCURRENT COMMENT PERIOD BEGINS WHEN THE NAVSAFECEN QUALITY
CONTROLS CHECKS ARE COMPLETED. DURING THIS PERIOD, ALL REQUIRED
ENDORSERS MUST, AND OTHER AUTHORIZED INDIVIDUALS MAY, REVIEW THE
SIREP/SIR/HAZREP IN CONCURRENT ORDER. ENDORSERS MUST ASSESS THE
OVERALL RIGOR AND THOROUGHNESS OF THE SAFETY INVESTIGATION,
EVALUATING THE FINDINGS, CAUSAL FACTORS, RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DOD
HFACS CODES THAT WERE ASSIGNED BY THE SIB OR SINGLE INVESTIGATING
OFFICER. ENDORSERS  WHO HAVE SUBSTANTIVE COMMENTS MUST ENTER THOSE
COMMENTS INTO THE RMI  PROGRAM OF RECORD DATABASE WITHIN 45 CALENDAR
DAYS. COMMENTS SHOULD FOLLOW THE TEMPLATE PROVIDED IN THE PUBS &
REFS SECTION OF THE RMI PROGRAM OF RECORD DATABASE. REQUIRED
ENDORSERS WHO CONCUR WITH THE FINDINGS, CAUSAL FACTORS,
RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DOD HFACS CODES IN THE SIREP/SIR/HAZREP, AND
HAVE NO COMMENTS AFTER COMPLETING THEIR REVIEW, HAVE NO FURTHER
REQUIRED ACTIONS, EXCEPT FOR THE CONVENING AUTHORITY.
THE CONVENING AUTHORITY MUST PROVIDE COMMENTS EVEN IF "CONCUR AS
WRITTEN" IS THE ONLY APPLICABLE COMMENT MADE.
(1) CURRENTLY, THERE IS NO RMI DIGITAL PROTECTION TO ENSURE
CONVENING AUTHORITIES HAVE ENDORSED THE REPORT PRIOR TO CLOSING THE
COMMENT PERIOD AFTER 45 DAYS.
(2) RMI OFFERS A FREE TEXT BOX TO ENTER COMMENTS DURING THE
CONCURRENT COMMENT PERIOD. ENDORSERS MUST FIRST IDENTIFY A REFERENCE
POINT FROM THE SIREP/SIR/HAZREP BEFORE ENTERING COMMENTS. TYPICALLY,
THE REFERENCE POINT WILL BE A FINDING, CAUSAL FACTOR, DOD HFACS
CODE, OR RECOMMENDATION.
(3) ALL ACTION AGENCIES ASSIGNED A RECOMMENDATION WILL SUBMIT THEIR
MISREC/HAZREC RESPONSE DURING THIS PERIOD. THESE RESPONSES WILL
INFORM THE CONVENING AUTHORITY ON THE FEASIBILITY OF THE
RECOMMENDATION, GIVE ADVICE TO ENSURE THE RECOMMENDATION IS PROPERLY
WORDED OR ALIGNED, AND PROVIDE A STATUS IF POSSIBLE. ONCE THE SIR IS
CLOSED OUT, THESE MISREC/HAZRECS WILL BE UPDATED/CLOSED USING THE
RECOMMENDATION MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONS IN RMI.
E. STEP FIVE. DELIBERATION AND ADJUDICATION PERIOD. ONCE THE 45
CALENDAR DAY CONCURRENT COMMENT PERIOD ENDS, THE FINAL ENDORSER WILL
REVIEW AND ADJUDICATE ALL COMMENTS AND COMPLETE THE FINAL
ENDORSEMENT DURING A 45 CALENDAR DAY DELIBERATION AND ADJUDICATION
PERIOD. WHEN COMPLETE, THE FINAL ENDORSEMENT (MOFE) IS RELEASED BY
ENTERING IT INTO THE RMI DATABASE. THE FINAL ENDORSEMENT (MOFE)
REPRESENTS THE INDEPENDENT FINAL EVALUATION AND POSITION ON THE
CAUSAL FACTORS, FINDINGS, RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DOD HFACS CODES OF A
MISHAP OR HAZARD INVESTIGATION. RELEASE OF THE FINAL ENDORSEMENT
(MOFE) OFFICIALLY CLOSES THE INVESTIGATION. CURRENTLY, CNO N09F
(NAVY AS WELL AS MARINE CORPS AVIATION) AND CMC SAFETY DIVISION
(MARINE CORPS GROUND) ARE THE FINAL ENDORSERS ON ALL REPORTS THAT
ARE IN THE MOFE PROCESS.

6. DETERMINING SIREP/SIR/HAZREP ENDORSERS. THE COMMANDS, ACTIVITIES,
AND INDIVIDUALS LISTED HERE ARE EITHER REQUIRED OR OPTIONAL
REVIEWERS, AS INDICATED, DURING THE CONCURRENT COMMENT PERIOD FOR
ALL SIREPS/SIRS AND HAZREPS THAT REQUIRE ENDORSEMENT.
A. REQUIRED ENDORSERS:
(1) CONVENING AUTHORITY.
(2) DESIGNATED ACTION COMMAND(S) OR AGENCY(IES) ASSIGNED ONE OR MORE
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS IN THE SIREP/SIR OR HAZREP.
(3) TYPE COMMANDER, FOR CLASS A AND B MISHAPS THAT INVOLVED ONE OF
THEIR ASSETS OR PERSONNEL.
(4) COMMANDING OFFICER(S) OF THE UNIT(S) INVOLVED IN THE MISHAP.
(5) MASTERS FOR MILITARY SEALIFT COMMAND VESSELS INVOLVED IN THE
MISHAP.
(6) COMMANDING OFFICER(S) AND COMMANDER(S) IN THE OPERATIONAL CHAIN
OF COMMAND OF THE UNIT(S) INVOLVED IN THE MISHAP FOR CLASS A AND B
MISHAPS.
(7) SYSTEMS COMMANDERS, FOR CLASS A AND B MISHAPS THAT REQUIRED
THEIR EXPERTISE DURING THE INVESTIGATION (E.G., ENGINEERING
INVESTIGATION).
(8) LEAD RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR A WEAPONS SYSTEM (E.G.,
A NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER), WHEN THAT WEAPONS SYSTEM WAS
INVOLVED IN A MISHAP FOR CLASS A AND B MISHAPS.
(9) A VESSEL'S COMMANDING OFFICER OR MASTER FOR MILITARY SEALIFT
COMMAND VESSELS, AND SUPERIORS IN THE CHAIN OF COMMAND, IF A MISHAP
INVOLVED A FATALITY, INJURY, OR PROPERTY DAMAGE TO EMBARKED MARINE
UNITS.
(10) NAVAL ORDNANCE SAFETY AND SECURITY ACTIVITY (NOSSA) OR MARINE
CORPS SYSTEM COMMAND IF INVOLVING A MARINE CORPS UNIT OR ACTIVITY.
B. OPTIONAL ENDORSERS:
(1) FLEET COMMANDER, FOR A MISHAP OCCURRING IN THEIR RESPECTIVE AREA
OF RESPONSIBILITY.
(2) COMMANDERS OF COMBATANT COMMANDS AND COMPONENT COMMANDERS OF
UNIFIED COMMANDS WHEN THE MISHAP OCCURRED DURING CONTINGENCY
OPERATIONS.
(3) INDIVIDUAL(S) FOUND CAUSAL IN THE FORMAL SIREP/SIR.
(4) DON AGENCIES OUTSIDE THE INVESTIGATING COMMAND, IF THEIR
FUNCTIONS WERE INVOLVED IN THE MISHAP OR HAZARD (OPTIONAL).
NOTE: UNSOLICITED COMMENTS BY OTHER AGENCIES AND ORGANIZATIONS
REVIEWING THE FORMAL SIREP/SIR MAY COMMENT ON THE FINDINGS, HUMAN
FACTORS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS EVEN THOUGH THEY ARE NEITHER IN THE
CHAIN OF COMMAND, NOR A DESIGNATED ACTION COMMAND OR AGENCY.

7. ENDORSEMENT PROHIBITIONS
A. ENDORSEMENTS OR EXTRACTS FROM ENDORSEMENTS MUST NOT BE APPENDED
TO, OR INCLUDED IN, JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL MANUAL (JAGMAN)
INVESTIGATION REPORTS, NOR ANY OTHER REPORTS.
B. ENDORSEMENTS MUST NOT INCLUDE ANY REFERENCE TO DISCIPLINARY
ACTION OR ANY OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION IN CONNECTION WITH THE
MISHAP BEING ENDORSED.

8. EXTENSION OF THE CONCURRENT COMMENT PERIOD
A. REQUIRED ENDORSERS MAY REQUEST AN EXTENSION OF THE CONCURRENT
COMMENT PERIOD. REQUESTS MUST PROVIDE SUFFICIENT JUSTIFICATION.
B. ONLY CNO N09F (NAVY AS WELL AS MARINE CORPS AVIATION) AND CMC
SAFETY DIVISION (MARINE CORPS GROUND) CNO N09F (NAVY AS WELL AS
MARINE CORPS  AVIATION) AND CMC SAFETY DIVISION (MARINE CORPS
GROUND) ARE AUTHORIZED  TO GRANT EXTENSIONS TO THE CONCURRENT
COMMENT PERIOD. NOTE: CONTROLLING CUSTODIANS RETAIN THE AUTHORITY
FOR GRANTING EXTENSIONS TO THE 30 DAY INVESTIGATION PERIOD (FOR
ENGINEERING INVESTIGATIONS, ETC.).

9. REOPENING AN INVESTIGATION
A. THE AUTHORITY TO REOPEN AN INVESTIGATION RESTS ONLY WITH THE
CONVENING AUTHORITY AND CNO N09F (NAVY AS WELL AS MARINE CORPS
AVIATION) AND CMC SAFETY DIVISION (MARINE CORPS GROUND).
B. IF ANY ENDORSER CONCLUDES THAT AN INVESTIGATION IS INCOMPLETE, OR
A SIREP/SIR OR HAZREP IS INADEQUATE, THEY MUST RECOMMEND THE
REOPENING OF THE INVESTIGATION BY PLAINLY STATING THIS
RECOMMENDATION WITH SPECIFIC JUSTIFICATION WHEN PROVIDING COMMENTS
DURING THE CONCURRENT COMMENT PERIOD.
C. WHEN AN INVESTIGATION IS REOPENED, THE CONVENING AUTHORITY OR
HIGHER AUTHORITY WHO HAS DIRECTED THE REOPENING, MUST CLEARLY
SPECIFY THE AREAS OF CONCERN/DEFICIENCIES TO THE SIB OR SINGLE
INVESTIGATING OFFICER.

10. INTRODUCTION OF NEW INFORMATION. IF, DURING THE DELIBERATION AND
ADJUDICATION PERIOD, THE CONVENING AUTHORITY, CNO N09F (NAVY AS WELL
AS MARINE CORPS AVIATION) AND CMC SAFETY DIVISION (MARINE CORPS
GROUND), LEARNS FACTS THAT WERE NOT AVAILABLE TO SAFETY
INVESTIGATORS, OR THAT SHED NEW LIGHT ON THE PUBLISHED FINDINGS,
CAUSES, AND RECOMMENDATIONS, THEY MUST TAKE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING
ACTIONS:
A. REOPEN THE INVESTIGATION.
B. INCLUDE THE NEW FACTS AS "COMMENTS FOR MOFE" BY SELECTING THE
"PROVIDE COMMENTS FOR MOFE" LINK.

11. SUBMISSION OF COMMENTS AFTER THE CONCURRENT COMMENT PERIOD.
COMMENTS CANNOT BE ENTERED INTO RMI ONCE THE CONCURRENT COMMENT
PERIOD HAS CLOSED. COMMENTS MAY BE SUBMITTED VIA E-MAIL TO THE NAVAL
SAFETY CENTER, BUT ARE CONSIDERED UNOFFICIAL COMMENTS AND MIGHT NOT
BE USED DURING THE MOFE DELIBERATION.

12. FINAL ENDORSEMENT. THE FINAL ENDORSEMENT (MOFE) WILL ADDRESS
FINDINGS, RECOMMENDATIONS, OTHER FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE, OTHER
RECOMMENDATIONS OF SIGNIFICANCE, DESIGNATED ACTION COMMAND OR AGENCY
RESPONSIBILITIES, AND DOD HFACS CODING. THE FINAL ENDORSEMENT IS
USED TO:
A. PROVIDE COMMENTS ABOUT FINDINGS TO ADDRESS PROCEDURAL ERRORS,
CHANGES TO CAUSAL OR NOT CAUSAL, ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS, OR TO ADD
INFORMATION NOT AVAILABLE TO THE SIB AND PROVIDE SPECIFIC
INFORMATION TO SUPPORT THE REQUESTED CHANGES.
B. PROVIDE COMMENTS ABOUT RECOMMENDATIONS TO ADDRESS PROCEDURAL
ERRORS, CHANGES TO DESIGNATED ACTION AGENCIES, OR TO MAKE ADDITIONS
AND OR DELETIONS.
(1) IF CHANGES TO DESIGNATED ACTION COMMANDS OR AGENCIES ARE
REQUIRED, PROVIDE CONTACT INFORMATION FOR THE NEWLY DESIGNATED
ACTION COMMAND OR AGENCY, TO INCLUDE THE NAME, RANK, OR GS GRADE,
OFFICE SYMBOL, DSN OR COMMERCIAL PHONE NUMBER, AND GOVERNMENT E-MAIL
ADDRESS. ADDITIONALLY, COMMENTS MAY ADDRESS THE RECOMMENDATION
NARRATIVE TO CLARIFY INTENT OR CORRECT ERRORS.
(2) IF A RECOMMENDATION HAS ALREADY BEEN COMPLETED AND THE ACTION
AGENCY HAS PROVIDED SUFFICIENT DOCUMENTATION OF ACTIONS TAKEN, THE
FINAL ENDORSER MAY CLOSE THE RECOMMENDATION IN THE FINAL ENDORSEMENT
(MOFE).
C. CNO N09F (NAVY AS WELL AS MARINE CORPS AVIATION) AND CMC SAFETY
DIVISION (MARINE CORPS GROUND) ARE THE FINAL ENDORSERS FOR ALL
SIREPS/SIRS AND HAZREPS THAT REQUIRE ENDORSEMENT. NOTE: THIS IS A
CHANGE FROM REF (A).

13. SIGNIFICANT CHANGES TO FINDINGS. IF THE FINAL ENDORSER ADDS A
PERSON TO A CAUSAL FINDING, OR SIGNIFICANTLY CHANGES AN INDIVIDUAL'S
ROLE IN THE FINDINGS, THE FINAL ENDORSER WILL NOTIFY THE INDIVIDUAL
THROUGH HIS/HER COMMAND SAFETY REPRESENTATIVE AND AFFORD THE
INDIVIDUAL AN OPPORTUNITY TO SUBMIT COMMENTS. COMMENTS ARE NOT
REQUIRED.
A. THE INDIVIDUAL WILL BE PROVIDED WITH PERTINENT SECTIONS OF THE
DRAFT FINAL ENDORSEMENT TO REVIEW.
B. NO OTHERS MAY PROVIDE FURTHER COMMENT (I.E., THE INDIVIDUAL'S
COMMAND).
C. THE INDIVIDUAL HAS 15 CALENDAR DAYS TO PROVIDE COMMENTS.
D. THE INDIVIDUAL MAY REQUEST AN EXTENSION WITH JUSTIFICATION TO THE
FINAL ENDORSER WHO MAY GRANT AN EXTENSION.
E. THE FINAL ENDORSEMENT (MOFE) MUST NOT BE RELEASED UNTIL AFTER THE
INDIVIDUAL HAS HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND.

14. DEFINITIONS.  THERE ARE NEW OR MODIFIED DEFINITIONS USED IN RMI
AS FOLLOWS.
A. MISHAP. A MISHAP IS ANY UNPLANNED OR UNEXPECTED EVENT OR SERIES
OF EVENTS THAT RESULTS IN DAMAGE TO DOD PROPERTY; OCCUPATIONAL
ILLNESS TO DOD PERSONNEL; INJURY TO ON- OR OFF-DUTY DOD MILITARY
PERSONNEL;INJURY TO ON-DUTY DOD CIVILIAN PERSONNEL; OR DAMAGE TO
PUBLIC OR PRIVATE PROPERTY, OR INJURY OR ILLNESS TO NON-DOD
PERSONNEL, CAUSED BY DOD ACTIVITIES.
(1) CLASS A MISHAP. THE RESULTING TOTAL COST OF DAMAGES TO
GOVERNMENT AND OTHER PROPERTY IS $2.5 MILLION OR MORE, A DOD
AIRCRAFT IS DESTROYED (EXCLUDING UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM GROUPS 1,
2, OR 3), OR AN INJURY OR OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS RESULTING IN A
FATALITY OR PERMANENT TOTAL DISABILITY.
(2) CLASS B MISHAP. THE RESULTING TOTAL COST OF DAMAGES TO
GOVERNMENT AND OTHER PROPERTY IS $600,000 OR MORE, BUT LESS THAN
$2.5 MILLION. AN  INJURY OR OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS RESULTS IN
PERMANENT PARTIAL DISABILITY, OR WHEN THREE OR MORE PERSONNEL ARE
HOSPITALIZED FOR INPATIENT CARE (WHICH, FOR MISHAP REPORTING
PURPOSES ONLY, DOES NOT INCLUDE JUST OBSERVATION OR DIAGNOSTIC CARE)
AS A RESULT OF A SINGLE MISHAP.
(3) CLASS C MISHAP. THE RESULTING TOTAL COST OF PROPERTY DAMAGES TO
GOVERNMENT AND OTHER PROPERTY IS $60,000 OR MORE, BUT LESS THAN
$600,000;OR A NONFATAL INJURY OR ILLNESS THAT RESULTS IN ONE OR MORE
DAYS AWAY FROM WORK, NOT INCLUDING THE DAY OF THE INJURY.
(4) CLASS D MISHAP. RECORDABLE INJURY OR ILLNESS NOT OTHERWISE
CLASSIFIED AS A CLASS A, B, OR C MISHAP (E.G., WORK-RELATED ILLNESS
OR INJURY THAT INVOLVES MEDICAL TREATMENT BEYOND FIRST AID, LOSS OF
CONSCIOUSNESS, LIGHT OR LIMITED DUTY FOR MILITARY PERSONNEL, OR
RESTRICTED WORK OR JOB TRANSFER FOR ON-DUTY NAVY AND MARINE CORPS
CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES); OR, A TOTAL COST OF DAMAGES FOR PUBLIC OR
PRIVATE PROPERTY OF $25,000 OR MORE, BUT LESS THAN $60,000.
(5) CLASS E MISHAP. AN INJURY OR DAMAGE NOT OTHERWISE CLASSIFIED AS
A CLASS A, B, C, OR D MISHAP. USE OF THE CLASS E MISHAP CATEGORY WILL
DIFFER BY COMMUNITY. FOR AVIATION, IF THERE IS COST ($1 TO $24,999)
OR ANY INJURY (INCLUDING FIRST AID), IT IS A CLASS E. CLASS E
MISHAPS WILL NOT BE PRIVILEGED, SO ESSENTIALLY CLASS E MISHAPS ARE
HAZREPS WITH COST/FIRST AID INJURY.
B. INCIDENT. A PLANNED OR UNPLANNED OCCURRENCE OR SERIES OF
OCCURRENCES RESULTING IN INJURY OR DAMAGE THAT DOES NOT MEET MISHAP
REPORTING CRITERIA. USED TO CAPTURE EVENTS THAT ARE EXEMPT FROM THE
PROVISIONS OF THE DODI 6055.07 (TABLE 8) OR 5102.1D/3750.6S. THESE
MAY BE RARE, BUT SOME ARE STILL MANDATORY REPORTS (E.G., INTENTIONAL
ACTS, WORKPLACE VIOLENCE, DIRECT ENEMY ACTION). THESE WILL NOT
REQUIRE A SAFETY INVESTIGATION AND BESIDES THE BASIC INFORMATION AND
A NARRATIVE, THEY DO NOT REQUIRE FACTORS, RECOMMENDATIONS, OR
ENDORSEMENT. NOTE: COMPONENT WEAR AND TEAR EXCEPTIONS OR ANY OTHER
INCIDENT, WHICH POSES A HAZARD TO NAVAL OPERATIONS, SHOULD STILL BE
REPORTED UNDER HAZARDS FOR TRACKING AND MITIGATION. IN DOING SO, YOU
CAN ALIGN RECOMMENDATIONS IN ORDER TO MITIGATE THESE HAZARDS UNLIKE
IN THE INCIDENT TAB.
C. HAZARD. ANY REAL OR POTENTIAL CONDITION THAT CAN CAUSE INJURY,
ILLNESS, OR DEATH TO PERSONNEL OR DAMAGE TO OR LOSS OF EQUIPMENT OR
PROPERTY, MISSION DEGRADATION. THESE ARE BROKEN INTO TWO AREAS:
(1) AN ACT OR EVENT (I.E., NEAR MISS) THAT MAY HAVE RESULTED IN A
MISHAP WHERE THE FATALITY, INJURY, ILLNESS, PROPERTY DAMAGE, OR LOSS
OF ASSET WAS AVOIDED MERELY BY CHANCE, THE ACTIONS OF A SINGLE
PERSON, A SMALL MEASURE OF DISTANCE, OR A FEW MOMENTS IN TIME.
(2) A WORK PLACE CONDITION THAT MIGHT RESULT IN INJURY, HEALTH
IMPAIRMENT, ILLNESS, DISEASE, OR FATALITY TO ANY WORKER WHO IS
EXPOSED TO THE CONDITION, OR WHICH MIGHT RESULT IN DAMAGE TO OR LOSS
OF PROPERTY OR EQUIPMENT.
D. CONVENING AUTHORITY (CA). RMI MERGES THE AUTHORITIES AND
RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE APPOINTING AUTHORITY, THE CA, THE
CONTROLLING CUSTODIAN (NON-AVIATION COMMUNITIES), AND SOME OF THE
AUTHORITY OF THE AIRCRAFT CONTROLLING CUSTODIAN (ACC) (AVIATION)
INTO THE RMI CA ROLE. IN RMI, THE CA APPROVES THE RELEASE OF THE
PRELIMINARY MESSAGE (COMPARABLE TO THE CURRENT INITIAL NOTIFICATION)
AND THE SIREP/SIR, SETS THE ENDORSING CHAIN, AND IS A MANDATORY
ENDORSER IN THE FIRST 45 DAY CONCURRENT COMMENT PERIOD. OF NOTE, THE
SECOND 45 DAY WINDOW IS FOR THE FINAL ENDORSER ONLY (CNO N09F (NAVY
AS WELL AS MARINE CORPS AVIATION) AND CMC SAFETY DIVISION (MARINE
CORPS GROUND). THE CA ALSO HAS RESPONSIBILITY FOR MISREC MANAGEMENT.
WHEN CA RESPONSIBILITIES ARE DELEGATED TO A LOWER LEVEL, THESE
AUTHORITIES ARE DELEGATED AS WELL. THE CA ROLE WILL TAKE SIGNIFICANT
BANDWIDTH. CONTROLLING CUSTODIANS OR ACCS ALWAYS RESERVE THE RIGHT
TO SERVE AS THE CA, BUT IF NOT EXPRESSLY REQUESTED, THE FOLLOWING
MATRIX WILL BE USED TO DETERMINE THE CA.
EXAMPLE:
CLASS A, B, C MISHAPS: CA: ECHELON II COMMAND, MARFOR LEVEL COMMAND,
TYCOM OR ACC (AVIATION), TYCOM (SURFACE/SUBMARINE), MARFOR (USMC)
CLASS D/E: O-6 LEVEL COMMAND
HAZARDS: O-5 LEVEL COMMAND
NOTE: IF THE CLASS D/E MISHAP/HAZREP RECOMMENDATIONS ARE EXTERNAL TO
THE UNIT, THE CA MUST BE EQUAL TO OR A GREATER ECHELON LEVEL THAN
ANY ACTION AGENCY ASSIGNED. IF THE RECOMMENDATIONS ARE FOR A SYSCOM
OR EXTERNAL TO THE UNIT'S CHAIN OF COMMAND, THEN ECHELON II, MARFOR
LEVEL COMMAND OR TYCOM MUST BE THE CA.
E. ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATION. ALSO KNOWN AS A REPORTING CUSTODIAN:
REPORTING CUSTODIANS ARE COMMANDING OFFICERS AND, IN SOME CASES,
OFFICERS-IN-CHARGE (OICS) OF DETACHMENT OPERATIONS OF NAVY AND
MARINE CORPS ORGANIZATIONS WHO ARE RESPONSIBLE TO ACCOUNT FOR, OR
OTHERWISE PROVIDE INFORMATION ABOUT, ASSIGNED ASSETS. IT IS THE
ORGANIZATION THAT EXPERIENCED THE LOSS OF AN OWNED ASSET, REGARDLESS
OF ANY DETERMINATION AS TO THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE EVENT. IF MORE
THAN ONE REPORTING CUSTODIAN IS INVOLVED IN A MISHAP, THE SENIOR
COMMAND (SENIOR COMMANDER) IS ASSIGNED AS THE ACCOUNTING
ORGANIZATION AND DOES THE REPORTING UNLESS RELIEVED BY HIGHER
AUTHORITY.
F. FACTORS. A FACTOR IS ANY DEVIATION, OUT-OF-THE-ORDINARY, OR
DEFICIENT ACTION OR CONDITION DISCOVERED IN THE COURSE OF A MISHAP
INVESTIGATION THAT IN OPINION OF THE SIB (OR SINGLE INVESTIGATING
OFFICER) CONTRIBUTED TO THE EVENTUAL OUTCOME. DETERMINING MISHAP
FACTORS (AND ELIMINATING NON-FACTORS) ENABLES THE INVESTIGATORS TO
FOCUS THE INVESTIGATION TO THOSE SPECIFIC AREAS THAT ARE SIGNIFICANT
IN THE MISHAP. RMI HAS THREE OPTIONS IN THE DROP DOWN MENUS: CAUSAL
FACTORS, FACTORS (NON-CAUSAL BUT CONTRIBUTING), AND NON-FACTORS
WORTHY OF DISCUSSION. THERE IS A FOURTH TYPE OF FACTOR, THE
NON-FACTOR, BUT THE NON-FACTOR IS NOT AVAILABLE IN THE DROP DOWN AND
INSTEAD WOULD BE LISTED IN THE NARRATIVE.
(1) CAUSAL FACTORS. FACTORS WHICH CAUSED THE MISHAP. IF THE FACTOR
WAS CORRECTED, ELIMINATED, OR AVOIDED, THE MISHAP / HAZARD / OR
INCIDENT WOULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED.
(2) FACTORS (NON-CAUSAL BUT CONTRIBUTING). FACTORS WHICH WERE
PRESENT BUT NOT NECESSARILY CAUSAL. FACTORS FORMERLY TERMED AS
"OTHER DAMAGE OR INJURY" WOULD NOW BE A FACTOR.
(3) NON-FACTORS WORTHY OF DISCUSSION (NFWOD). NFWODS TYPICALLY FALL
INTO ONE OF THREE CATEGORIES: AREAS UNCOVERED DURING THE
INVESTIGATION THAT DID NOT CAUSE THE MISHAP OR INFLUENCE THE OUTCOME
BUT SHOULD BE FIXED DUE TO THE POTENTIAL TO BE A FACTOR IN A FUTURE
MISHAP (E.G.,INCORRECT INFORMATION IN A MAINTENANCE PUBLICATION),
AREAS THAT WERE THOROUGHLY INVESTIGATED AND SUBSEQUENTLY RULED OUT
AS FACTORS (IN ORDER TO PROVIDE CONTEXT TO THE AUDIENCE ON WHY THESE
AREAS ARE NOT FACTORS), AND AREAS THAT MAY BE CONSIDERED AN INTEREST
ITEM TO THE CA (E.G.,RISK MANAGEMENT, CREW RESOURCE MANAGEMENT,
ETC.). NFWODS ARE THE SOURCE FOR OTHER FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
OF SIGNIFICANCE. EXAMPLES: IMPLEMENTATION OF FLIGHT DATA RECORDERS,
NOT CAUSAL OR CONTRIBUTORY, BUT IMPORTANT FOR THE ORGANIZATION'S
SAFETY POSTURE.
(4) NON-FACTORS. NON-FACTORS ARE A LIST OF THOSE AREAS/ITEMS THE SIB
(OR SINGLE INVESTIGATING OFFICER) CONSIDERED, BUT DETERMINED NOT TO
BE A FACTOR IN THE MISHAP AND NOT WORTHY OF ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION.
THE NON-FACTORS WILL BE LISTED AT THE BOTTOM OF THE NARRATIVE. IT IS
NOT AN ALL-ENCOMPASSING LIST, BUT RATHER A LIST OF AREAS/ITEMS THE
SIB (OR SINGLE INVESTIGATING OFFICER) INVESTIGATED AND RULED OUT,
SIMILAR TO REJECTED CAUSAL FACTORS IN WESS BUT WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION
NEEDED.
G. FINDINGS. THE TERM, "FINDING" IS NEW AND ESTABLISHES LINES OF
EVIDENCE. EACH FINDING IS A SINGLE EVENT, CONDITION, OR DATA POINT
WHICH IS IMPORTANT IN THE MISHAP / HAZARD, BUT NOT NECESSARILY
CAUSAL. FINDINGS ARE USED TO ESTABLISH FACTORS. EACH FACTOR MUST BE
ASSOCIATED WITH AT LEAST ONE FINDING. THERE ARE THREE TYPES OF
FINDINGS: CAUSAL PRIMARY FINDING, NON-CAUSAL FINDING, AND OTHER
FINDING OF SIGNIFICANCE. THESE ARE IMPORTANT BECAUSE THEY LINK TO
THE TYPES OF RECOMMENDATIONS.
(1) CAUSAL PRIMARY FINDING: ASSOCIATED WITH A CAUSAL FACTOR.
(2) NON-CAUSAL PRIMARY FINDING: ASSOCIATED WITH A NON-CAUSAL BUT
CONTRIBUTORY FACTOR.
(3) OTHER FINDING OF SIGNIFICANCE: ASSOCIATED WITH NON-FACTORS
WORTHY OF DISCUSSION (NFWOD).
H. RECOMMENDATIONS. RECOMMENDATIONS FULFILL THE SAME PURPOSE AS WITH
WESS. RECOMMENDATIONS ARE USED TO ADDRESS HAZARDS IDENTIFIED DURING
THE INVESTIGATION AND DESCRIBE THE RISK CONTROLS NECESSARY TO
MITIGATE THE RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH THE HAZARD. IN RMI, THERE ARE TWO
TYPES OF RECOMMENDATIONS, PRIMARY RECOMMENDATIONS AND OTHER
RECOMMENDATIONS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
(1) PRIMARY RECOMMENDATION. THIS IS A RECOMMENDATION WHICH FIXES
CAUSAL AND NON-CAUSAL FACTORS.
(2) OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS OF SIGNIFICANCE (ORS). ORS ARE
RECOMMENDATIONS WHICH FIX FACTORS / FINDINGS THAT THE SAFETY
INVESTIGATORS BELIEVE COULD CONTRIBUTE TO FUTURE MISHAPS AND/OR
WARRANT COMMAND ATTENTION, BUT WERE NOT PART OF THE MISHAP. THESE
RECOMMENDATIONS ARE GENERATED FROM NON-FACTORS WORTHY OF
DISCUSSION (NFWOD). SINCE THE CONCEPT OF ORS WERE EXPRESSLY
FORBIDDEN IN WESS/PREVIOUS SAFETY REPORTING POLICY, THIS CONCEPT OF
APPLYING RECOMMENDATIONS TO SOMETHING THAT WAS NOT "CAUSAL" OR
"OTHER DAMAGE OR INJURY" IS NEW. CONVENING AUTHORITIES MUST
CAREFULLY SCRUTINIZE NFWODS AND ORS TO ENSURE THEY ARE AIMED TO
ADDRESS THE RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH A SPECIFIC HAZARD AND THAT THEY DO
NOT JUST BECOME A LAUNDRY LIST OF THINGS THE FLEET WANTS.
I. ASSIGNING RECOMMENDATIONS. RMI HAS TWO OPTIONS TO ASSIGN
RECOMMENDATIONS. AN OPR (OFFICE OF PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY) AND AN
OCR (OFFICE OF COLLATERAL RESPONSIBILITY).
(1) AN OPR IS REQUIRED FOR EVERY RECOMMENDATION. THE OPR IS A
SPECIFIC ACTION AGENCY POC, BY NAME, ASSIGNED TO THE RECOMMENDATION.
THE OPR IS USED AS THE PRIMARY CONTACT FOR RECOMMENDATIONS. IN SOME
INSTANCES, COMMANDS MAY DETERMINE THEIR SPECIFIC OPR ACTION AGENCY
POC IS BETTER PAIRED TO A SPECIFIC COMMAND JOB BILLET TO ENSURE
CONTINUITY OF EFFORT FOR SIB RECOMMENDATIONS. THESE INDIVIDUALS WILL
HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO UPDATE THE RECOMMENDATION AND RECOMMEND
CLOSURE. (2) AN OCR IS NOT REQUIRED FOR EVERY RECOMMENDATION. OCRS
ASSIST THE OPR IN COMPLETING THE RECOMMENDATIONS. YOU CAN HAVE
MULTIPLE OCRS FOR EACH RECOMMENDATION.

15. RMI USER GUIDE/RMI SPECIAL EDITION MAGAZINE. IN PREPARATION FOR
THE RELEASE OF RMI, AN RMI USER GUIDE (WHICH DELVES INTO THE
TECHNICAL DETAILS OF THE SYSTEM) AND AN RMI SPECIAL EDITION
MAGAZINE, WHICH PROVIDES A BROADER DESCRIPTION THAN THE USER GUIDE,
ARE NOW AVAILABLE FOR USE AT:
HTTPS://SAFETY.NAVYLIVE.DODLIVE.MIL/FILES/2020/07/RMI-SPECIAL-EDITION
.PDF

16. NAVAL SAFETY CENTER/CMC SAFETY DIVISION POINTS OF CONTACT:
A. RMI HELP DESK: TEL: 833- 637-3669/EMAIL: NESD.RMI.FCT@NAVY.MIL
B. GENERAL OPNAVINST 5102.1D POLICY QUESTIONS: LEWIS, ALAN
R/NAVSAFECEN/TEL:757-444-3520 X7037/TEL:DSN 564-3520
X7037/EMAIL:ALAN.R.LEWIS@NAVY.MIL
C. GENERAL OPNAVINST 3750.6S POLICY QUESTIONS/AVIATION SPECIFIC
QUESTIONS: HYAMS, ADAM/NAVSAFECEN/ TEL:757-444-3520 X7226/TEL:DSN
564-3520 X7225/EMAIL:ADAM.E.HYAMS@NAVY.MIL
D. SHORE/SYSCOM SPECIFIC QUESTIONS: GUM, CHARLES E
/NAVSAFECEN/TEL:757-444-3520 X7022/TEL:DSN
564-3520X7022/EMAIL:CHARLES.GUM@NAVY.MIL
E. AFLOAT SPECIFIC QUESTIONS: KEIM, RON/NAVSAFECEN/TEL: 757-444-3520
X7090/TEL:DSN 564-3520 X7090/EMAIL:RON.KEIM@NAVY.MIL
F. NAVY EXPEDITIONARY OPS/DIVING SPECIFIC QUESTIONS: BEJO,
PETRIT/NAVSAFECEN/TEL:757-444-3520 X7374/TEL:DSN 564-3520
X7374/EMAIL:PETRIT.BEJO@NAVY.MIL
G. MARINE CORPS SPECIFIC QUESTIONS: BEDELL, THOMAS M., COL/CMC
SAFETY DIVISION/TEL:703-604-4361/EMAIL: THOMAS.BEDELL@USMC.MIL;
WARTHEN,ALTON, LTCOL/CMC SAFETY DIVISION/TEL: 703-614-4172/EMAIL:
ALTON.WARTHEN@USMC.MIL//
BT
#0614
NNNN